The Fertility Revolution: How Endometriosis Surgery Changes Pregnancy Outcomes With Prof. Horace Roman

The First Podcast
The First Podcast
The Fertility Revolution: How Endometriosis Surgery Changes Pregnancy Outcomes With Prof. Horace Roman
Loading
/

Send us a text with a question or thought on this episode ( We cannot replay from this link)

Professor Horace Ramon, a world-renowned endometriosis surgeon and researcher, reveals how excision surgery can significantly improve fertility outcomes for women with endometriosis. His groundbreaking studies show that nearly half of women with colorectal endometriosis can conceive naturally after surgery, while those with multiple failed IVF attempts saw remarkable improvement in pregnancy rates following proper excision.

• Fertility rates after colorectal endometriosis surgery can reach 80%, with most pregnancies occurring naturally
• For women with failed IVF attempts, excision surgery resulted in a 45% pregnancy rate compared to an expected 5% with additional IVF
• Surgical expertise matters significantly – endometriosis surgery should be performed by specialists with high case volumes
• When preserving fertility, sometimes draining endometriomas rather than excising them may better protect ovarian reserve
• The prevalence of endometriosis is increasing partly because modern women have 450-500 menstrual cycles in a lifetime compared to less than 150 in the 19th century
• Expert centers should offer long-term management strategies that consider a patient’s fertility goals and extend to menopause
• Multidisciplinary teams are essential for optimal endometriosis care, including fertility specialists, colorectal surgeons, pain specialists, and others

Continue advocating for yourself and seek care from true endometriosis specialists with proven surgical volume and experience, not just social media presence. A proper excision surgery can transform both your quality of life and fertility outcomes.

Support the show

Website endobattery.com

Instagram: EndoBattery

Introduction to Fertility After Endo Surgery

Speaker 1
0:00

What

if

surgery
,

not

just

IVF
,

could

make

the

difference

in

your

fertility

journey

with

endometriosis
?

In

this

episode

of

EndoBattery
,

I

sit

down

with

Professor

Horace

Ramon
,

a

world-renowned

surgeon

and

researcher
,

to

talk

about

his

groundbreaking

studies

on

fertility

after

endometriosis

surgery
.

His

research

showed

that

nearly

half

of

women

with

colorectal

endometriosis

were

able

to

conceive

naturally

after

surgery

and
,

for

women

who

had

gone

through

multiple

rounds

of

IVF
,

excision

surgery

gave

many

of

them

their

first

chance

at

pregnancy
.

This

conversation

is

about

more

than

numbers
.

It's

about

hope
,

options

and

the

power

of

treating

endometriosis

at

its

root
.

Tune

in

as

I

sit

down

with

Professor

Horace

Ramon

to

go

over

all

his

work

and

so

much

more
.

Stick

around
.

Speaker 1
0:52

Welcome

to

EndoBattery
,

where

I

share

my

journey

with

endometriosis

and

chronic

illness
,

while

learning

and

growing

along

the

way
.

This

podcast

is

not

a

substitute

for

medical

advice
,

but

a

supportive

space

to

provide

community

and

valuable

information
,

so

you

never

have

to

face

this

journey

alone
.

We

embrace

a

range

of

perspectives

that

may

not

always

align

with

our

own
,

believing

that

open

dialogue

helps

us

grow

and

gain

new

tools
.

Join

me

as

I

share

stories

of

strength
,

resilience

and

hope
,

from

personal

experiences

to

expert

insights
.

I'm

your

host
,

alana
,

and

this

is

Endobattery

charging

our

lives

when

endometriosis

drains

us
.

Welcome

to

Endobattery
.

Grab

your

cup

of

coffee

or

your

cup

of

tea

and

join

me

at

the

table

Today
.

Speaker 1
1:37

I

am

so

honored

to

welcome

Professor

Horace

Ramon
,

a

world-renowned

surgeon

and

researcher

in

the

field

of

endometriosis
.

Professor

Ramon

has

published

some

of

the

most

impactful

studies

we

have

on

fertility

outcomes

after

surgery

for

deep

colorectal

endometriosis
.

His

work

has

changed

how

we

think

about

the

relationship

between

endometriosis
,

excision

surgery

and

pregnancy

rates
,

especially

for

patients

who

have

struggled

with

multiple

failed

IVF

attempts
.

We're

going

to

explore

that

today

in

a

way

that

gives

hope
,

clarity

and

practical

insights

to

those

navigating

this

journey
.

Please

help

me

in

welcoming

Professor

Horace

Ramon

to

the

table
.

Thank

you
,

professor

Ramon
,

so

much

for

sitting

down

with

me

and

taking

the

time

to

help

us

understand

some

great

work

that

you're

doing

in

the

endometriosis

space
,

as

well

as

understanding

excision

and

endometriosis

as

it

stands
.

It

is

a

complete

honor

for

me

to

be

able

to

sit

down

with

you

and

take

this

time

and

learn

from

you
,

so

thank

you

so

much
.

Speaker 2
2:39

Thank

you

very

much

for

inviting

me
.

Speaker 1
2:41

Anytime
.

It's

an

honor

for

anyone

to

be

able

to

sit

in

this

space

and

learn

from

one

of

the

best

in

the

world

in

endometriosis

excision

and

you

also

teach

endometriosis

excision
.

Can

you

start

by

telling

us

what

inspired

your

focus

on

endometriosis

and

fertility
,

and

particularly

in

complex

cases

like

colorectal

and

deep

infiltrating

endometriosis

and

fertility
,

and

particularly

in

complex

cases

like

colorectal

and

deep

infiltrating

endometriosis
?

Speaker 2
3:07

Yes
,

so

my

story

started

in

2003

when

I

discovered

endometriosis
,

and

at

that

moment

I

was

in

the

fifth

year

of

residency
.

So

I

discovered

this

disease

very
,

very

late

because

it

was

unknown
.

Very
,

very

few

gynecologists

were

aware

about

endometriosis

at

that

time

and

I

had

the

chance

to

work

with

Professor

Michel

Canis
,

the

past

president

of

the

AAGL
,

and

I

saw

him

performing

this

surgery

and

I

fell

in

love

with

the

surgery

of

endometriosis
.

Before

being

gynecologist
,

I

had

the

training

in

colorectal

surgery

and

in

neurosurgery
.

So

I

was

four

years
,

I

had

been

a

resident

in

neurosurgery
.

Speaker 2
3:56

So

I

was

looking

for

an

interesting

and

exciting

and

complex

surgery

in

gynecology

and

also

I

was

looking

for

a

field

where

the

research

is

not

as

developed

and

where

I

can

bring

my

contribution

to

the

development

of

the

knowledge
.

And

the

endometriosis

meets

all

these

criteria
.

I

stated

that

I

will

be

an

endometriosis

surgeon

in

2005
.

And

at

that

moment

most

of

my

colleagues

were

surprised

because

they

did

not

understand

what

actually

I

want

to

do
,

because

for

them

endometriosis

was

PO

and

generate

analogs
,

and

me

I

said

no
,

no
,

no
,

endometriosis

is

surgery
,

and

I

started

doing

surgery

in

2005
.

Speaker 1
4:41

Wow
,

it's

shifted

and

changed

so

much
.

But

one

of

the

things

that

I

really

feel

like

is

progressing

and

is

amazing

is

the

work

that

you're

doing

to

help

many

people

understand

endometriosis

much

better
.

One

of

the

articles

that

you

published

the

high

postoperative

fertility

rate

following

surgical

management

of

colorectal

endometriosis

patients
.

This

study
,

when

I

initially

looked

at

it
,

kind

of

threw

me

for

a

little

bit

because

I

would

have

never

in

a

million

years

correlated

what

your

findings

were
,

which

is

fertility

rates

and

colorectal

endometriosis
.

Can

you

go

over

this

study

just

a

little

bit

and

break

this

down

for

people

to

understand

kind

of

what

this

study

entailed
,

as

well

as

what

some

of

these

findings

were
?

Speaker 2
5:31

Yes
,

now

I

will

start

with

the

onset
.

So

you

have

to

know

that

in

2008
,

I

became

a

PhD

in

epidemiology

and

clinical

studies
.

So

I

accomplished

this

PhD

in

order

to

have

the

tools

to

perform

good

level

clinical

studies

and

in

2009
,

I

could

have

a

grant

to

open

a

large

database

and

to

enroll

prospectively

all

my

patients
.

So

since

2009
,

I

have

had

with

me

a

clinical

researcher
,

which

is

not

involved

in

care

but

only

in

the

management

of

the

database
.

So

this

clinical

researcher

now

I

have

two

clinical

researchers

because

the

database

is

larger
,

but

I

always

have

had

someone

taking

care
,

giving

preoperative

questionnaires

to

patients

taking

care
.

That

may
,

I

feel

a

surgical

questionnaire

and

then

calling

the

patients

one

year
,

three

years
,

five

years
,

10

years

after

the

surgery

to

see

what's

happened

during

this

interval
.

It

means

that

I

have

a

database

with

now

I

think

we

have

5,000
,

6,000

women

who

had

surgery

well-done

surgery
,

excisional

surgery

with

a

follow-up

which

now

is

15

years

the

oldest

patients

have

15

years

of

follow-up

and

we

have

just

today

submitted

an

article

about

15

years

follow-up

after

colorectal

endometriosis

surgery

years

follow-up

after

colorectal

endometriosis

surgery
.

So

this

database

allows

me

to

study

everything

post-operatively
,

what's

happened

after

the

surgery
,

and

it

also

allows

me

to

see

the

real

number
,

the

real

percentage

who

is

pregnant

and

who

is

not
,

how

the

pregnancy

is

achieved
,

how

long

time

after

the

surgery
.

Speaker 2
7:26

And

I

could
,

in

this

case

I

could
,

publish

studies

which

show

that

after

the

surgery

of

most

advanced
,

most

complex

endometriosis
,

the

pregnancy

rate

is

very

high
.

And

this

happened

at

a

moment

where

a

lot

of

colleagues
,

a

lot

of

gynecologists
,

were

telling

to

patients

don't

have

surgery

because

you

will

be

infertile
.

And

my

answer

was

no
.

Conversely
,

if

you

want

to

be

pregnant
,

please

consider

the

surgery

as

a

treatment

of

your

infertility
.

And

of

course
,

all

my

studies

try

to

put

in

the

mirror

pregnancy

rate

in

women

who

have

no

surgery

and

have

only

IVF

with

women

who

have

surgery
.

And

I

could

demonstrate

that

women

with

surgical

management

of

endometriosis

have

at

least

the

same

pregnancy

rate

that

women

who

have

up

to

four

IVF

successive

IVF
.

And

right

now

in

the

world

there

are

two

randomized

trials

comparing

in

a

random

manner
,

comparing

IVF

to

the

surgery
.

One

of

them

is

in

France
,

endofert
,

and

the

other

one

is

Bordeaux

and

Denmark

it

calls

F4
.

So

I

am

involved

in

both

studies
,

I

recruit

for

both

studies

because

both

studies

the

hypothesis

is

based

on

my

data

and

both

studies

try

to

show

that

the

Professor Ramon's Journey into Endometriosis

Speaker 2
8:52

pregnancy

rate

after

the

surgery

with

natural

conception

or

post-operative

IVF
,

this

pregnancy

rate

is

better

than

in

women

who

have

no

surgery

and

are

sent

directly

to

IVF
.

Speaker 2
9:04

Wow
,

but

the

surgery

is

like

the

Soxer
,

like

everything

else
.

Better

than

in

women

who

have

no

surgery

and

are

sent

directly

to

IVF
.

Wow
,

but

the

surgery

is

like

the

sockser
,

like

everything

else
.

So

surgery

is

not
.

We

cannot

speak

about

surgery
.

We

speak

about

surgeons

who

perform

surgery
.

So

some

surgical

procedures

may

render

the

patients

infertile

if

the

surgeon

does

not

take

care

at

ovaries
.

So

we

have

a

myriad

of

patients

who

had

cystectomy
,

bilateral

cystectomy
,

and

their

ovarian

reserve

went

down

at

the

point

that

no

IVF
,

nothing

is

feasible
.

So

the

surgery

is

a

very

good

tool

to

improve

fertility

when

the

surgeon

takes

care

of

what

he

level
,

whereas

not

everyone

is
.

Speaker 1
10:07

Does

that

change

the

fertility

rate

for

those

patients

depending

on

their

surgeon's

skill

level
?

Speaker 2
10:14

Now

the

surgery

is

a

manual

craft

and

I

compare

the

surgery

to

the

Soxer
.

So

everybody

knows

that

football

players

do

not

play

alike
.

So

you

have

Messi
,

ronaldo

and

Pelé

they

are

stars

and

then

there

are

other

guys

who

play

the

Soxer

less

and

have

less

results
.

But

the

surgery

is

alike
.

So

you

cannot
,

in

some

cases

you

cannot

compare

the

results

between

several

surgeons
.

That's

why

all

the

studies

reporting

results

of

the

surgery

should

be

read

from

the

first

row

to

the

last

one
,

and

to

see

who

performed

the

surgery
,

who

are

the

surgeons
,

where

is

the

center
.

For

example
,

the

results

in

terms

of

fertility

after

a

surgery

done

by

the

team

of

Marcello

Ceccaroni

in

the

Negrar

Hospital

in

Italy
,

which

is

the

biggest

endometriosis

center

in

the

world
,

cannot

be

the

same

with

the

results

performed

in

the

hospital

in

a

small

town
,

even

though

in

theory

there

is

the

same

surgery
.

So

it

is

politically

correct

to

say
,

yes
,

we

are

all

at

the

same

level
,

but

in

theory

there

is

not
.

That

is

not

true
.

So

a

good

surgery

for

me

in

endometriosis

takes

care

to

the

excision

which

is

done

depending

on

several

factors

on

patient's

age
,

intention

to

get

pregnant
,

features

of

the

lesion
,

but

also
,

or

more

than

the

features
,

the

symptoms

which

are

related

to

each

lesions
.

I

think

that

a

good

surgery

should

completely

excise

all

the

lesions

which

are

symptomatic
,

while

lesions

who

are

not

symptomatic

should

be

discused

case

by

case
.

Some

of

them

can

be

removed

and

some

of

them

cannot

be

removed

or

can

be

left

behind

if

the

price

to

pay

for

this

excision

is

high
.

In

other

terms
,

if

one

patient

comes

with

me
,

I

receive

a

lot

of

emails

from

patients

where

they

sent

me

a

picture

with

a

big

nodule

of

the

rectum

and

they

said

what

I

have

to

do
.

And

my

answer

is

I

don't

know
,

because

with

this

nodule

you

can

have

the

surgery

or

you

cannot

having

the

surgery
.

It

depends

what

do

you

feel
?

Because

if

you

have

a

big

nodule

of

the

rectum

and

the

patient

is

completely

asymptomatic

by

chance
,

it

is

for

sure

that

performing

the

surgery

increased

the

risk

that

patient

became

symptomatic

after

the

surgery
.

Speaker 2
12:50

So

there

are

some

I

think

I

have

at

least

10

or

15

patients

with

very

severe

endometriosis

and

I

see

them

every

year
.

I

tell

them

the

surgery

is

justified

if

you

have

just

one

symptom
.

And

I

ask

them

every

year

do

you

have

a

symptom

or

you're

still

asymptomatic
?

They

say

I'm

still

asymptomatic
.

Okay
,

see

you

next

year
.

So

this

is

the

philosophy

of

endometriosis
.

So

the

endometriosis

is

not

a

cancer

and

should

not

be

treated

like

a

cancer

If

the

patient

should

have

a

better

quality

of

life
.

It

means

that

you

have

carefully

to

treat

all

the

lesions

with

or

symptomatic
,

and

you

have

to

take

care

at

the

resection

excision

of

lesions

which

are

not

symptomatic

in

order

to

avoid

new

symptoms

which

are

sequelae

of

your

surgery
.

And

this

is

the

same

on

fallopian

tubes

and

on

ovaries
.

Speaker 1
13:40

It's

kind

of

like

essentially

saying

you're

going

to

eradicate

lesions

that

are

creating

the

symptoms
,

but

if

something's

not

affecting

you
,

you

don't

want

to

disturb

that

tissue

creating

more

issues
.

Is

that

kind

of

what

you're

pointing

to

being

valuable

in

surgery
?

Speaker 2
13:59

Exactly

so
.

A

very

interesting

information

about

the

postoperative

pregnancy

rate

after

complex

surgery

for

deep

endometriosis

was

provided

by

a

randomized

trial
.

I

carried

conservative

to

radical

surgery

for

colorectal

endometriosis

and

the

goal
,

the

main

endpoint
,

was

the

bowel

function

after

the

surgery
.

So

the

goal

of

the

trial

was

to

prove

that

if

we

perform

disc

excision

Groundbreaking Fertility Research Findings

Speaker 2
14:40

or

shaving
,

you

have

the

same

results

than

those

after

colorectal

resection
,

maybe

with

less

complications

and

with

the

same

rate

of

recurrences
.

So

I

enrolled

60

patients

and

these

60

patients

I

carefully

followed

them

up

at

six

months
,

one

year
,

up

to

10

years
.

So

this

woman
,

this

60

woman
,

I

know

them

as

they

were

from

my

family

Because

I

met

them

so

frequently
.

And

10

years

after

the

surgery
,

the

rate

of

loss

of

follow-up

is

9%
,

meaning

that

more

than

90%

of

patients

came

up

to

10

years

to

tell

me

how

they

feel
.

And

I

observed

that

among

this

woman

who

all

had

a

very

advanced

surgery

with

colorectal

resection
,

parametrium

reimplantation

of

the

ureter
,

very
,

very

severe

surgery

After

the

surgery
,

among

the

patients

who

intended

to

get

pregnant
,

80%

could

be

pregnant
,

and

most

of

them

naturally
.

And

then

I

looked

at

inside

the

woman

who

were

pregnant
,

I

looked

at

who

was

infertile

before

my

surgery
,

who

came

to

the

surgery

with

the

sticker

of

infertile

need

IVF
,

and

in

this

subgroup

of

women

infertile

women

who

had

complex

surgery

for

correct

endometriosis

the

pregnancy

rate

was

75%
.

Wow
,

and

even

in

this

group

most

pregnancies

were

natural
.

And

for

me
,

this

study
,

with

actually

no

loss

of

follow-up
,

with

very

accurate

long-term

follow-up
,

this

study

provided

me

that

proved

me

that

the

surgery

for

complex

endometriosis

improves

the

fertility

rate
.

And

I

put

these

results

in

the

mirror

with

studies

done

by

two

friends

of

me
,

two

French

friends

from

other

hospitals
,

who

reported

the

pregnancy

rate

in

women

with

severe

corrector

endometriosis

who

had

no

surgery

but

only

IVF
,

and

both

of

them

estimated

that

if

women

with

colorectal

surgery

have

1
,

2
,

3
,

or

4

IVF
,

they

can

be

pregnant

in

60-65%

of

cases
,

all

pregnancies

or

IVF
.

Speaker 2
17:02

Now
,

it

is

difficult

to

compare

80%

to

65%

in

two

different

populations
.

Right
,

I

cannot

state

that

my

pregnancy

rate

is

higher

than

the

pregnancy

rate

of

the

IVF
,

but

I

can

state

that

if

you

perform

a

complete

surgery

of

endometriosis
,

the

patients

will

feel

better

in

the

long

run

because

10

years

after

the

surgery

they

are

still

in

good

shape
.

The

complaints

are

improved

in

the

long

run
.

Currency's

rate

on

the

rectum

10

years

after

the

surgery

is

5%

and

they

were

pregnant

in

80%

of

cases
.

So

at

least

the

same

rate

you

may

have

in

the

same

patients

without

surgery
,

with

symptoms
,

with

big

lesions
,

bigger

and

bigger
,

once

one
,

two
,

three

or

four

IVFs

are

done
.

So

this

allows

me

to

state

that

if

you

do

a

correct

surgery
,

there's

no

reason

to

be

frightened

by

the

risk

of

infertility

because

you

have
.

Conversely
,

you

have

the

opposite

result

you

improve

the

fertility
.

This

may

happen

even

in

women

with

low

ovarian

reserve
.

Speaker 1
18:14

Wow
,

why

do

you

think

doing

surgery

in

those

patients

who

had

bowel

or

colorectal

surgery

for

endometriosis

had

such

a

significant

improvement

in

fertility
?

What

would

cause

that
?

Speaker 2
18:26

Well
,

we

do

not

know

exactly

If

the

patient

has

a

bowel

endometriosis

together

with

ovarian

fallopian

tube

endometriosis
.

It

is

obvious

that

removing

the

bowel

endometriosis
,

together

with

restoring

the

fallopian

tube

patency

and

removing

the

ovarian

cyst
,

of

course
,

it

improves

the

fertility

Right
.

You

may

have

infertile

women

with

bowel

endometriosis

and

the

fallopian

tubes

are

almost

normal

and

the

ovaries

are

involved

by

only

superficial

lesions
.

In

this

case
,

after

the

surgery
,

I

am

almost

sure

that

they

will

be

pregnant

naturally

and

I

think

that

in

this

case

the

endometriosis

impaired

the

pregnancy

in

an

indirect

manner
,

because

it

had

been

demonstrated

that

endometriosis
,

like

the

smoke
,

may

affect

the

fertility

at

every

level
,

beginning

with

the

quality

of

the

oocyte
,

with

the

mobility

of

the

sperm
,

with

the

inflammatory

ambience

of

the

pelvis

where

the

meeting

between

the

spermatozoa

and

ovocytes

occurs
.

So

at

every

level

endometriosis

may

reduce

the

probability

of

pregnancy

and

I

think

that

cleaning

the

pelvis

we

give

a

supplementary

chance

for

natural

pregnancy
.

Speaker 1
19:48

It's

a

remarkable

finding
.

I

feel

like

a

lot

of

us

wouldn't

have

put

those

two

together
,

Although

I

think

in

a

lot

of

ways

it

makes

sense
,

because

the

more

your

body

is

fighting

against

itself

and

has

a

diseased

state
,

it

would

make

sense

that

it's

harder

to

become

pregnant
.

It's

not

your

body's

not

at

its

optimal
.

Speaker 2
20:08

Then

there

is

another

factor

of

infertility
,

of

natural

conception
,

which

is

the

deep

dyspareunia

we

do

not

speak

about
.

We

do

not

speak

enough

about

deep

dyspareunia
.

But

women

with

big

rectovaginal

nodules

have

less

sex

than

women

who

are

not

painful

of

a

genital

nodule
,

have

less

sex

than

women

who

are

not

painful
,

and

they

may

be

painful
,

more

painful
,

during

exactly

the

three

days

of

ovulation
.

At

that

time

they

reduce

the

frequency

of

sexual

intercourse
.

They

may

be

involved

too

in

a

better
,

in

an

improvement

of

natural

conception

rate
.

Speaker 1
20:39

Yeah
,

well
,

and

it

makes

sense
,

with

the

inflammation

that

we

experience

oftentimes

during

our

cycle

and

when

we're

in

a

flare
,

why

that

would

be

so

much

harder
.

Speaker 1
20:49

And

eradicating

that

disease

is

so

important

for

that

conception
,

so

your

body

can

function

normally

and

not

have

the

inflammation
.

It

makes

a

lot

of

sense

from

that

perspective
.

There

was

another

study

that

you

did

which

I

think

is

interesting

because

you

touched

on

the

IVF

and

you

know

women

who

had

IVF

previously

maybe

had

failed

IVF
.

You

did

another

study

of

pregnancy

rates

after

surgical

treatment

of

deep

infiltrating

endometriosis

in

infertile

patients

with

at

least

two

previous

IVF

ICSI

failures
.

Can

you

touch

on

that
?

Because

I

think

a

lot

of

people

don't

really

know

do

they

want

to

try

IVF

first
?

Do

they

want

to

potentially

look

at

excision

for

endometriosis

first
,

and

what

are

the

pros

and

cons

of

that
?

But

this

study

kind

of

looked

at

that

and

highlighted

that

a

little

bit

more
.

Can

you

speak

to

that
?

Speaker 2
21:41

Yes
,

in

some

cases

the

patient

have

an

endometriosis
,

a

deep

endometriosis
,

and

someone

else

decided

to

refer

them

to

IVF
.

What's

happened

in

France
?

Four

IVF

or

reimbursed
,

so

for

free
,

wow
.

So
,

as

women

know

that

they

have

four

IVF

for

free
,

when

they

have

the

second

and

the

third

IVF

failure
,

they

think

about

let's

do

something

different

for

the

last

one
,

because

after

that

it

is

not

longer

for

free
.

So

I

have

a

lot

of

patients

coming

to

seek

care

and

to

ask

about

their

endometriosis

management
.

Once

they

had

two

or

three

IVF

and

I

asked

I

was

a

professor

in

Rouen

at

that

time
.

Speaker 2
22:22

It

was

in

2016
,

I

think

10

years

ago

and

I

asked

one

of

my

residents

which

was

very

interested

in

fertility
.

I

said

let's

look

at

all

our

patients

who

come

with

at

least

two

IVF
.

Let's

see

if

we

do

the

surgery
,

what's

happened

after
?

Anyway
,

as

the

patients

are

recorded

in

our

database
,

we

can

very

easily

see

what's

happened

after

our

surgery
.

Right
,

and

actually

we

put

the

threshold

to

two

IVF
,

but

the

mean

number

of

IVF

in

our

Syria

was

three
,

because

the

patients

go

up

to

the

four

IVF

and

they

come

to

do

something

before

the

fourth

IVF
,

which

is

the

last

one
,

which

is

reimbursed

come

to

do

something

before

the

fourth

IVF
,

which

is

the

last

one

which

is

reimbursed
.

So

after

three

IVF

failures
,

performing

the

surgery

was

followed

by

a

pregnancy

rate

of

45%
.

Now
,

45%

of

course

is

very

far

from

80%
,

but

let's

put

in

the

mirror

the

results

which

can

be

expected

if

the

patients

with

three

failure

do

the

fourth

IVF
.

And

we

have

this

information

in

the

studies

I

talk

to

you

where

the

patients

did

not

have
,

in

other

facilities
,

in

Cochin

and

Tenron

Hospital

in

Paris
,

where

the

patients

went

up

to

four

IVF

without

having

surgeries
.

Speaker 2
23:42

In

this

study

you

see

very
,

very

clearly

that

women

who

still

have

colorectal

endometriosis

and

go

to

IVF

have

a

pregnancy

rate

of

about

35%

after

the

first

IVF
.

Then

if

they

go

to

the

second

IVF

they

have

maybe

20%
.

So

the

step

is

lower
.

A

third

IVF

will

bring

10%

more
,

while

the

fourth

IVF

almost

nothing
.

Wow
,

because

if

you

fail

free

IVF
,

it

means

that

something

happens
,

something

does

not

work

Right
.

We

should

compare

our

40%
,

45%

pregnancy

rate
,

not

to

80%

but

to

5%
,

which

would

have

been

expected

if

the

patient

had

had

the

fourth

IVF

after

three

failures
.

So

even

in

this

patient
,

in

this

patient
,

I

think

we

can

improve

something
.

That's

why
,

in

our

daily

practice

patients

who

had

two

IVF

failures
.

We

discuss

them

in

our

multidisciplinary

meeting

and

in

a

majority

of

cases

we

propose

the

surgery

before

the

last

two

IVFs
.

Speaker 1
24:54

For

the

IVF

piece

of

it
.

I

think

a

lot

of

people

feel

like

that

is

their

first

line

of

defense

for

infertility
.

And

you're

saying

that

when

you

go

and

have

endometriosis

excision

surgery

by

an

expert
,

your

chances

even

of

naturally

conceiving

are

much
,

much

higher
.

And

then

if

you

do

IVF
,

your

chances

of

conception

are

even

higher

than

if

you

would

have

just

done

IVF

naturally
.

I

think

yes
.

Speaker 2
25:21

If

you

have

the

surgery

and

then

you

go

to

natural

conception

or

to

IVF
?

Naturally
,

I

think

yes
.

If

you

have

the

surgery

and

then

you

go

to

natural

conception

or

to

IVF
.

If

the

fallopian

tubes

are

destroyed

or

if

you

do

not

achieve

natural

conception

after

one

year
,

you

go

to

IVF
.

So

all

these

solutions

taken

together

80%

of

pregnancy

rate

in

my

series

of

patients
,

with

actually

no

loss

of

follow-up
.

Speaker 1
25:47

Wow
.

Speaker 2
25:48

That's

a

huge
.

But

now

the

situation

is

more

difficult

and

this

is

just

a

samurai
.

We

samurais
,

but

we

use

every

case

in

our

multidisciplinary

meeting
.

Because

if

a

woman

has

come

with

an

ovarian

reserve

which

is

very
,

very
,

very
,

very

low
,

almost

zero
,

of

course

you

can

do

whatever

you

wish
.

The

results

will

not

be

satisfactory
.

They

can

be

pregnant
,

but

the

pregnancy

rate

is

much

lower
.

If

the

husband

has

a

sperm

which

is

completely

abnormal
,

naturally

or

IVF

by

IVF
,

it

will

be

difficult
.

So

but

if

you

put

everybody
,

all

the

patients
,

together
,

we

expect

to

have

higher

pregnancy

rate
.

Speaker 2
26:33

And

the

two

randomized

trials

which

are

ongoing

right

now

have

the

same

hypothesis

that

in

the

group

of

surgery

you

expect

a

higher

pregnancy

rate

than

in

the

group

of

only

IVF
.

Speaker 2
26:47

So

we

speak

about

pregnancy

rate
,

but

then

we

have

to

speak

also

about

the

complaints

the

risk

of

growth

of

endometriosis

during

the

time

necessary

for

IVF
,

risk

of

complication

you

may

expect

after

a

big

nodule

when

compared

to

a

smaller

nodule

you

could

have

removed

three

years

earlier
.

Speaker 2
27:14

So

all

these

factors

taken

together
,

that

in

my

daily

practice
,

if

I

see

a

patient

with

infertility

and

severe

endometriosis
,

in

theory

80%

of

patients

receive

a

surgery

and

20%

are

referred

for

the

IVF
.

So

I

can

refer

for

the

IVF

a

patient

who

has

a

deep

endometriosis

but

she's

not

symptomatic

Two

ovarian

endometriomas
,

fallopian

tubes

which

are

not

in

good

shape
,

so

the

natural

pregnancy

is

very

unlikely
,

and

a

husband

with

abnormal

sperm
.

So

here
,

when

I

expect

that

this

patient

needs

an

IVF
,

I

give

her

the

choice

for

IVF

and

if

she's

not

very

symptomatic
,

it

is

logically

not

to

perform

a

surgery

with

risk

of

functional

sequeira

and

to

propose

her

to

start

by

IVF

sequeira

and

to

propose

her

to

start

by

IVF
.

And

then

for

patients

who

tell

me

immediately

my

first

goal

is

the

pregnancy

and

I

want

to

go

to

the

IVF
,

I

just

want

to

tell
,

I

just

want

to

hear

from

you

if

it

is

risky

to

do

this
.

Speaker 1
28:20

So

there's

like

there's

this

balance

between

starting

IVF

first

and

then

or

doing

surgical

management

first
,

yes
,

and

the

surgical

management

piece

of

it

you're

saying

if

you're

symptomatic
,

surgery

might

make

sense

prior

to

starting

IVF
.

Speaker 2
28:35

Of

course
,

and

then
,

yeah
,

if

I

have

a

patient

with

a

very

severe

endometriosis

suboclusive

endometriosis
,

very

severe

endometriosis
,

suboclusive

endometriosis
.

If

I

have

a

patient

with

a

big

rectovaginal

nodule

which

is

still

feasible
,

where

the

disc

excision

is

still

feasible

but

where

the

growth

of

the

nodule

would

require

a

low

rectal

resection
,

in

these

patients

I

advise

the

surgery

because

I

said
,

look
,

if

you

do

one

or

three

IVF

and

you

come

back

within

two

years

and

this

nodule

is

bigger
,

we're

not

longer

able

to

do

this

conservative

surgery
.

I

am

able

to

do

this

today

and

maybe

we

will

go

to

the

more

aggressive

surgery

and

the

price

to

pay

may

be

a

lower

acceleratory

action

syndrome

with

bowel

sequeira
,

which

are

related

to

the

surgery
,

because

the

surgery

should

be

done
.

So

I

think

it's

in

your

interest

to

go

to

the

surgery

right

now

because

anyway

I

will

take

care

of

your

ovaries
.

So

it's

happened
,

for

example
,

that

in

this

woman
,

if

they

have

bilateral

endometriomas
,

the

fallopian

tubes

are

not

in

good

shape

and

during

the

surgery

I

know

that

they

need

an

IVF
.

Speaker 2
29:45

After

my

surgery

I

may

simply

drain

the

ovaries

not

to

excise
.

So

I

can

excise

everything

everywhere
,

diaphragm

everything

except

the

ovaries
.

So

Surgery vs. IVF: Comparing Success Rates

Speaker 2
29:55

for

the

ovaries

I

may

put

in

the

front

the

pregnancy

intention

and

the

preservation

of

the

ovarian

reserve
.

It

seems

for

me

more

important

than

the

complete

excision

of

endometriomas

Interesting
.

We

may

combine

this
.

Speaker 1
30:10

Interesting
.

You

know
,

I've

always

heard

that

you

want

to

take

everything

out

regardless
.

Speaker 2
30:15

Yes
,

in

theory
.

In

theory
,

very

specific

cases
.

For

example
,

if

you

have

a

patient
,

painful

patient
,

right
,

let's

say
,

25-year

year

old
,

very

painful
,

you

see

her
,

she

has

an

eight

centimeter

endometrioma

on

the

right

side
,

a

four

centimeter

endometrioma

on

the

left

side
.

She's

single
.

So

you

cannot

refer

her

for

IVF
.

She's

painful
,

you

have

to

do

the

surgery
.

The

best

attitude

is

not

to

remove

the

endometrioma
,

is

not

to

remove

the

endometrioma
.

So

in

this

patient
,

if

someone

goes

to

remove
,

to

excise

the

endometriomas
,

the

ovarian

reserve

will

go

down
.

So

I

think

the

excision

should

be

forbidden

under

the

jail
.

You

do

this

under

the

jail
,

I'm

joking
.

It

should

be

forbidden

by

the

law
.

In

this

patient

you

can

do

the

surgery

to

relieve

the

symptoms
.

You

can

do

a

sclerotherapy

or

a

drainage

on

both

ovaries
.

You

reduce
,

evacuate

the

cyst
.

You

refer

immediately

the

patient

to

ovocet

freezing
.

You

introduce

a

pill

in

order

to

avoid

that

at

the

first

period

the

cyst

come

back

Right
.

So

you

freeze

15

or

20

OOCs

and

then

you

come

back

and

you

treat

the

endometriosis
.

Speaker 1
31:32

Interesting
.

Speaker 2
31:33

So

the

patient

is

painful
,

you

have

to

do

something

Right
,

but

you

choose

your

weapon
.

Speaker 1
31:39

Right

and

getting

the

patient

understanding

what

the

overall

goal

is

for

the

patient
,

whether

they

want

to

have

children

or

not
.

But

in

this

instance
,

when

you

have

patients

coming

in

saying

I

want

children
,

I'm

not

there

yet
,

but

my

endometriosis

is

bad

enough
,

I

just

need

symptom

relief
.

This

is

an

avenue

in

which

they

could

go
.

In

these

circumstances
,

do

you

have

them

freeze

their

ovocytes

and

then

do

you

have

hormonal

suppression

at

that

point
,

or

is

that

you

don't

even

touch
?

Speaker 2
32:09

yes
,

for

example

me
.

I

have

a

lot

of

patients

who

had
,

who

have

have

already

frozen
.

They

all

there
,

right

woman
.

Most

of

them

will

never

need

their

OC

because

then

the

surgery

I

did

preserved

ovarian

reserve

so

they

will

be

pregnant

naturally
.

But

the

ovarian

ovocet

freezing

is

necessary

when

you

have

a

single

woman
,

young
,

with

good

ovarian

reserve

and

bilateral

big

endometriomas
.

Ovarian

situation
.

Second

situation

you

have

a

patient

with

subocclusion

because

of

the

big

nodule

of

the

rectum
.

She

wants

to

get

pregnant
.

She

is

at

the

limit

of

the

occlusion
.

So

you

have

to

do

the

surgery

because

stimulating
,

doing

an

IVF

on

a

subocclusive

lesion

may

push

definitively

the

patient

into

occlusion
.

It

has

been

demonstrated
.

Speaker 2
32:59

I

had

patients

like

this
.

So

after

the

surgery
,

but

she

has

two

big

endometriomas

on

each

ovary
.

In

this

case

if

you

do

a

complete

excision

move

the

ovarian

bowel

endometriosis
,

deep

endometriosis

and

ovarian

endometriomas

the

ovarian

reserve

will

go

down

and

this

is

definitively

lost
.

So

in

this

case

I

start

by

looking

at

the

fallopian

tube
.

If

the

fallopian

tube
,

if

the

fallopian

tube

are

in

good

shape

and

if

I

estimated

at

the

end

of

the

surgery

I

could

clean

everything
,

she

can

go

to

the

natural

conception
.

The

natural

conception

is

likely

In

this

case
.

Speaker 2
33:40

I

do

a

very

careful

cystectomy

on

each

side
.

Her

reserve

is

good

before

the

surgery
.

If

the

reserve

is

low

or

if

the

fallopian

tubes

are

not

in

good

shape

shape

and

I'm

sure

that

she

needs

an

IVF

I

certainly

won't

remove

the

endometriomas

by

excision

because

the

ovarian

reserve

will

go

down

and

the

IVF

will

fail
.

It

is

important

to

understand

that

a

patient

who

needs

an

IVF

needs

a

good

ovarian

reserve
.

Right
,

it

requires

a

good

ovarian

reserve
.

The

stimulation

requires

a

good

ovarian

reserve
.

The

same

patient

if

she

goes

to

the

natural

conception
,

the

ovarian

reserve

may

be

lower
.

There

is

no

problem
.

Speaker 1
34:23

Right
.

Speaker 2
34:23

So

she

needs

one

OOC

every

month
.

So

women

with

low

ovarian

reserve

after

the

surgery

may

be

pregnant

naturally

in

the

same

manner

as

women

with

normal

ovarian

reserve
.

But

if

the

IVF

is

most

likely

it

is

better

not

to

excise
,

and

this

is

the

experience
.

Speaker 1
34:42

Right
,

yeah
,

and

that's

what

I

was

going

to

say
.

Speaker 2
34:43

This

is

the

experience

of

the

surgeon

and

the

culture

of

the

experience
.

Right
,

yeah
,

and

that's

what

I

was

going

to

say

the

experience

of

the

surgeon

and

the

culture

of

the

surgeon
.

That's

why

it's

very

difficult

to

standardize

everything

in

endometriosis

and

that's

why

it's

very

difficult

to

create
,

I

think
,

software

of

artificial

intelligency

to

give

the

good

management

in

each

case
.

Speaker 1
35:04

Yeah
,

well
,

that's

what

I

was

going

to

say
.

I

think

this

is

something

that

not

every

surgeon

would

even

consider

or

even

know

about
,

because

it

takes

years

of

really

integrating

yourself
,

not

only

on

the

surgical

side

of

things

but

also

the

academic

and

research

side

of

things
,

to

really
,

I

think
,

understand

probably

some

of

the

nuances

of

fertility

and

endometriosis
.

So

I

think

that's

probably

one

of

the

things

that

I

hear

a

lot

of

people

talk

about

is
,

you

know
,

I

went

in

for

this

surgery

and

I

still

can't

get

pregnant
,

but

they

just

the

provider

just

kind

of

left

it

at

that
.

There

was

no

workup

as

to

why
,

or

their

approach

was

a

standardized

approach
,

because

this

is

what

we

do
.

This

is

all

I

know
.

You

know
,

you

hear

about

providers

doing

excision
,

but

they

have

a

routine

of

excision
.

They

aren

the

guidelines
,

yes
,

of

course
,

but

the

guidelines
?

Speaker 2
35:55

are

not

the

Bible

or

not

the

Torah

or

not

the

Koran
,

or

based

on

the

data

we

have
,

if

we

have

data

Right
.

So

in

this

case
,

unfortunately
,

the

patient

falls

between

two

studies
,

two

results
,

and

you

have

to

do

with

what

you

feel
,

with

what

you

smell
,

and

this

becomes

difficult

and

that's

why

I

think

there

are

15

years

I

have

stated

that

the

endometriosis

surgery

should

be

a

subspecialty
,

and

in

2011,
.

So

in

2005
,

I

decided

to

become

an

endometriosis

surgeon
,

but

until

2011
,

of

course
,

I

also

did

over

cancer

and

sacro-colpo-pexi
,

but

in

2011
,

I

could

afford

to

stop

all

over

surgeries

until

I

was

having

enough

endometriosis

patients

to

fill

in

all

my

program

and

not

to

take

care

about

other

specialties
.

And

I

think

that

at

that

moment

I

started

understanding

much

deeper

everything
.

Speaker 2
37:13

Well
,

for

example
,

in

France

but

worldwide
,

there

is

a

discussion

about

what

policy

we

have

to

adopt
.

Should

we

create

expert

centers
?

Should

we
?

And

if

we

create

expert

center
,

where

we

have

to

put

the

threshold

Volume

of

surgery
,

you

need

to

state

I

am

expert
,

and

when

this

discussion

is

done

with

colleagues
,

of

course

each

one

tried

to

push

the

threshold

down

below

his

level

and

they

say

no
,

it

is

not

demonstrated

that

doing

only

this

make

you

better

than

having

a

more

generalistic

practice
.

And

I

said

I

cannot

agree

with

this

Because

if

I

agree
,

if

I

say

you're

right
,

it

means

everything

I

have

done

during

the

last

15

years

is

for

nothing
,

because

I

decided

to

do

only

this
.

If

I

consider

that

I

could

be

good

enough

by

doing

only

one

corrective

endometriosis

a

month

once

now

I'm

doing

30
,

it

means

I

was

completely

wrong

in

everything

I

have

done
.

So

I

was

not

right

at

all

and

I

believe

I

was

right
.

Speaker 1
38:22

Yeah
,

you

know

I

equate

this

to

you

know
,

had

a

lot

of

dental

work

done

a

while

back

and

I

think

of

it

like

this
,

and

this

is

the

best

way

that

I've

been

able

to

explain

this

to

people

Dental
,

you

have

your

general

dentist
.

They

are

good

for

your

cleanings
,

they're

good

for
,

you

know
,

just

dental

maintenance
,

right
,

and

that's

your

general

GYN

or

family

practitioner
.

And

then

if

there's

something

more

that

needs

to

be

done

say

you

need

there's

an

infection

or

there's

something

crowding

of

your

teeth
,

then

you

go

see

the

orthodontist

for

the

braces
,

right
?

So

it's

a

different

specialty
,

although

maybe

the

orthodontist

could

clean

the

teeth

or

you

know

the

dentist

could
,

you

know
,

look

at

the

infection
,

who

knows
?

But

then

they

say

you

need

to

remove

your

teeth
,

a

tooth
,

well
,

you

have

to

go

to

the

surgeon
,

you

have

to

go

to

the

endodontist

and

you

have

to
.

So

there's

so

many

different

steps

depending

on

what

you

need

done

when

it

comes

to

dental

work
.

Yet

there

is

not

that

when

it

comes

to

endometriosis
.

Speaker 2
39:24

We

make

it

such

a

broad

specialty

if

you

will

Exactly
,

and

this

was

happening

30

years

ago

in

cancer

Right
.

20

years

ago

it

was

stated

only

those

who

have

a

volume

of

cancer

surgery

are

allowed

to

do

this

cancer
,

to

continue

to

do

cancer

surgery
.

Right
,

it

was

very
,

very

difficult

to

make

people

to

accept

they

could

not

be

good

enough

to

perform

cancer

surgery

but

in

two

or

three

years

the

low

was

should

be

agreed

by

everybody
,

but

it

was

very

difficult
.

Speaker 1
40:00

Yeah
.

Speaker 2
40:00

The

problem

is

in

cancer
.

If

you

have

worse

results
,

you

can

see

immediately

because

the

survival

rate

is

low
.

Endometriosis

is

much

more

difficult

because

the

patient

will

not

die
,

they

will

just

be

painful
.

So

it

is

very
,

very

difficult

in

endometriosis

to

assess

the

results

of

someone
.

Speaker 1
40:20

Right

yeah
.

Speaker 2
40:35

And

the

endometriosis
.

Right

now

it's

a

kind

of

no

man

land
,

Right

yeah
,

a

confusion
,

because

they

allowed

the

surgeon

to

say

I

can

do

this
.

I

can

do

this

Because

in

social

media
,

everybody
,

everybody

may

seem

more

beautiful

than

it

really

is
.

Speaker 1
40:53

Yeah
,

yeah
,

it

is

true
.

I

mean
,

I

think

there's

a

lot

of

times

if

the

words

look

fancy

and

the

picture

matches

the

word

of

fancy
,

then

they

must

be

qualified

and

that

is

just

simply

not

true
.

I

think

that's

where

a

lot

of

times
,

our

eyes

can

deceive

us

a

little

bit

on

who

we

think

is

an

actual

surgeon

and

expert

in

that

field
,

and

that's

where

I

think

due

diligence

is

essential
.

Understanding

how

long

someone

has

done

something
,

where

their

training

has

been

done
,

what

their

training

is

specifically

in
,

I

think

makes

a

huge

difference
.

And

it's

not

just

fellowship

trained
,

it's

actual
,

like

integrative

training

and

having

a

large

number

of

cases

in

your

repertoire

before

you

can

really

Exactly

A

large

number

of

cases

and

enough

number

of

procedures
,

of

complex

procedures
.

Speaker 1
41:46

Yes
.

Speaker 2
41:47

And

we

now
.

We

think

that

to

state

that

someone

is

has

a

high

level

in

endometriosis
,

it

needs

should

perform

at

least

one
,

at

least

20

complex

surgery

a

year
.

When

I

proposed

40
,

then

I

went

down

to

20

in

France

and

there

are

a

lot

of

colleagues

who

said

no
,

20

is

too

much
.

I

said

no
,

20

means

one

complex

surgery

every

two

weeks
.

Like

surgery

every

two

weeks

is

not

too

much
.

And

they

said

no
,

like

this
,

you

have

to
.

You

have

to

put

the

threshold

at

your

level
.

I

said

no
,

this

was

my

level

in

2007
,

not

now
.

Speaker 1
42:24

Wow
.

Speaker 2
42:25

So

so

the

converse
.

I

think

one

complex

surgery

every

two

weeks

is

the

minimal
.

Feel

yourself

comfortable

with

the

complex

surgery
.

Speaker 1
42:34

Yeah
,

what

qualifies

something

as

a

complex

surgery
?

I

think

that

might

be

something

that

could

be

a

differentiating

factor
,

because

some

might

think
,

you

know
,

having

a

bowel

lesion

is

a

complex

surgery
.

To

you
,

what

would

be

a

complex

surgery
?

Speaker 2
42:48

To

state

that

something

is

complex

surgery
,

you

need

some

criteria

which

cannot

be

Surgical Approaches to Preserve Fertility

Speaker 2
42:55

fancy
,

which

should

be

real
.

One

such

criteria

is

the

bowel

suture
.

You

need

to

perform

a

bowel

suture
.

Nobody

will

do

a

bowel

suture

just

for

the

fun

because

a

bowel

suture
.

Nobody

will

do

a

bowel

suture

just

for

the

fun
,

because

a

bowel

suture

is

a

risky

procedure
.

So

a

complex

surgery

for

me

and

in

what

I

propose

in

France
,

is

performing

either

a

suture

of

the

bowel
,

either

a

suture

of

the

ureter
,

either

a

suture

of

the

diaphragm
,

either

a

complete

releasing
,

a

complete

neuralysis

of

the

sci

suture
.

But

the

bladder

is

easier
.

So

you

should

not

be

very
,

very

expert

to

be

able

to

remove

a

bladder

nodule
.

But

these

procedures

have

a

very

specific

code

and

nobody
,

nobody
,

even

someone

which

is

not

honest

at

all
,

will

not

do

it

just

for

the

fun

and

just

to

reach

the

number
.

So

they

are

procedures

which

are

required

by

a

complex

situation
,

a

complex

endometriosis
.

Speaker 1
44:00

Yeah
,

and

you

definitely

want

someone

that

knows

what

they're

doing

when

they're

doing

that
,

because

it

could

really

damage

the

outcome

of

not

only

longevity

and

pain

relief
,

but

also
,

as

we

were

talking

about
,

fertility
,

and

that's

why

having

an

expert

who

understands

not

only

the

fertility

aspect

of

it

but

also

the

endometriosis

aspect

of

it

is

really

important

to

have

both
.

Speaker 2
44:23

And

to

state

that

your

center

is

a

multi-discipline
.

Now

it's

very

interesting

because

in

2019
,

we

have

the

visit

of

the

Surgical

Review

Corporation
,

because

we

asked

to

have

the

certification

of

Center

of

Excellence

in

minimally

gynecological

surgery

basic

gynecological

surgery

and

we

had

an

inspector

who

came

and

see

us

and

then

the

end

of

the

day
,

when

she

checked

everything

a

whole

day

of

visit

she

said

it's

very

funny
,

but

you

have

only

one

disease
,

you

take

care

only

about

one

disease
.

I

said

because

you

are

in

endometriosis

center
.

She

said

I

have

never

seen

this
,

but

do

you

think

we

can

create

a

certification

for

endometriosis

centers
?

We

said
,

of

course
,

yeah
,

we

are

thinking

about

this

and

we

propose

her

the

threshold
,

taking

care

not

to

put

them

very
,

very

high

because

the

interest

is

to

recruit
.

That's

why

and

honestly
,

now

the

Surgical

Review

Corporation

certification

for

complex

endometriosis

care

and

the

multisignal

endometriosis

care

is

based

on

our

center
.

Speaker 2
45:28

It's

the

middle

of

our

center

and

we

said

such

a

center

should

have

a

multi-specialty

team
.

So

you

need
,

of

course
,

gynecologists

who

have

at

least

70%

of

activity

in

endometriosis
,

you

need

fertility

specialists
,

you

need

colorectal

surgeon
,

neurologist
,

gastroenterologist
,

a

physician

specialized

in

pain

management

Very
,

very

important

the

pain

management

specialist

and

then
,

of

course
,

physiotherapist

and

a

very

good

radiologist
.

So

all

team

and

this

team

should

meet

together

at

least

once

a

month

to

discuss

maybe

not

all

the

folders
,

because

we

carry

out

100

endometriosis

surgeries

a

month
,

so

you

can

do

stuff

to

discuss

100

medical

charts
,

but

every

month
,

but

we

discuss

30
,

the

most

complex
.

So

we

have

one

meeting

every
,

which

takes

four

hours

five

hours

the

time

we

need
,

and

we

discuss

the

most

complex

cases

and

we

choose

this

we

spoke

about

should

the

patient

go

directly

to

IVF
?

Should

go

to

the

surgery
?

If

we

propose

the

surgery
,

what

kind

of

surgery

we

propose
?

What

we

remove
,

exactly

what

we

do

not

remove
,

what

we

drain
,

what

we

excise
,

so

we'll

do

a

robotic

surgery
.

Speaker 1
46:49

And

then

after

that

discussion

I'm

sure

the

patient

has

a

lot

of

say

in

this

as

well

and

then

after

that

discussion

I'm

sure

the

patient

has

a

lot

of

say

in

this

as

well

Then

you

go

back

and

present

to

the

patient

what

the

course

of

action

would

be
,

so

that

it's

that

informed

consent

piece

as

well
.

Speaker 2
47:02

Yes
,

exactly

my

goal

is
.

Then
,

once

a

patient

had

the

discussion

with

me
,

the

goal

is

that

she

says

oh

yes
,

now

this

guy

understood

what

I

have
.

I

questioned

and

I

knocked

at

the

right

door

For

this
.

A

meeting

with

a

patient

may

take

30

minutes
.

For

the

first

time
,

it

may

take

one

hour
.

So

we

should

not

be

into

the

rush

because
,

particularly

in

complex

endometriosis

surgeries
,

is

a

long

list

of

complications
,

benefits

to

discuss
,

and

everything

should

be

very
,

very
,

very
,

very
,

very

clear
.

Otherwise

there

is

a

risk

of

misunderstanding
,

lack

of

satisfaction
,

litigation

litigation

and

all

the

things

that

kind

of

come

along

with
.

Speaker 1
47:58

That

absolutely

do

you

find
,

since

you've

done

this

research

and

with

years

of

experience

under

your

belt

seeing

all

these

different

patients
,

I

think

what's

interesting

is

you

know

we're

talking

about

the

experience

aspect

of

it

and

to

get

to

that

point

you

have

to

do

all

these

cases
.

But

if

there

is

a

provider

out

there

who

is

walking

through

that

right

now
,

if

you

could

jump

back

into

time

and

tell

them

one

thing
,

one

of

the

most

important

things

that

you've

learned

in

this

process

to

getting

to

where

you're

at
,

what

would

you

say
?

That

is

what

has

changed

the

most

in

your

outcome
.

Speaker 2
48:30

I

think

everything

changed
.

Everything

changed

and

even

my

practice
.

My

surgical

procedures

have

changed
.

So

I

do

not

hesitate

to

change

one

of

my

approach

if

my

study

shows

that

something

else

works

better
.

What

it

changed

is

the

knowledge
,

the

general

knowledge

In

endometriosis
.

Now

it

is

maybe

fourfold

more

than

when

I

started

in

2003
.

The

number

of

publications

with

endometriosis

in

the

world

are

fourfold

more

numerous

now

than

in

2003
.

Speaker 2
49:08

It's

incredible
,

the

surgical

tools

in

2003
,

we

have

only

small

screens
,

no

HD
,

no

3D
.

Now

I

cannot

imagine

how

I

could

do

the

surgery

at

that

time
.

And

as

I

record

everything
.

I

had

recorded

all

my

procedures

since

2005,
.

So

I

have

everything

recorded

on

hard

disk
.

When

I

go

back

to

these

movies
,

I

said
,

oh

my

God
,

it's

incredible
.

I

was

a

beginner

experience

and

I

could

do

this

surgery

with

good

results

using

these

tools
.

This

looks

to

me

unbelievable

now
,

because

now

I

carried

out

all

the

robotic

surgery
,

big

screen
,

this
.

So

our
,

this

or

our

operative

theater

is

very

high

technique
.

Speaker 2
49:55

But

this

was

not

the

same

20

years

ago
.

Then

the

strategies
,

the

strategies

to

manage
,

or

much

more

clear

for

everybody
,

the
,

the

knowledge
,

the
,

the

willing

to

do

to

increase

the

quality

of

life
,

was

not
.

We

were

not

speaking

about

this

in

2003
.

2003
,

the

goal

was

to

remove

everything
,

whatever

the

price

to

pay
.

Then

the

patient

were

having

self-catheterization

low

anterior

sexual

syndrome
.

I

remember

the

people

were

saying
,

yes
,

this

shows

that

it's

a

complex

surgery
,

right
?

Speaker 2
50:41

I

remember

in

2010
,

I

published

a

paper

in

Human

Reproduction
,

which

is

one

of

the

top

three

journals

in

the

world

in

gynecology

and

obstetrics
,

with

a

series

of

only

50

cases

of

colorectal

endometriosis
.

Because

in

these

50

cases
,

I

asked

a

question

which

was

not

asked

before

how

are

the

bowel

movements

after

my

surgery
?

Because

until

2010
,

if

you

look

at

all

the

articles

presenting

the

bowel

endometriosis

surgery
,

the

results

were

assessed

on

the

basis

of

dysmenorrhea
,

dyspareunia
,

chronic

pain

Right
,

which

are

not

directly

related

to

resecting

the

bowel
.

So

you

do

not

resect

the

bowel

and

to

say

I

resected

the

bowel

because

the

dysmenorrhea

improved

or

the

dyspareunia

improved
.

So

it

is

shocking

now

to

think

that

we

were

resecting

the

bowel

without

assessing

the

bowel

function
,

the

bowel

without

assessing

the

bowel

function
.

I

think

that

before

2010
,

only

the

papers

of

the

team

of

Marcello

Ciccaroni

was

assessing

this

dysfunction

and

then
,

after

2010
,

quality

of

life
,

the

function
,

the

low

anterior

recession

syndrome

become
.

So

I

think

the

patients

who

had

the

surgery

in

2005,
.

25

are

more

fortunate

than

those

who

had

the

surgery

in

2000
.

Speaker 1
52:01

I

look

back

at

my

first

surgery
,

which

was

in

2010
.

And

I

think

about

what

I
?

There

was

not

a

lot

even

spoken

about

endometriosis

back

then

for

my

first

surgery

and

of

course

I

had

ablation

because

that's

all

they

really

knew

in

the

area

that

I

was

at

and

I

didn't

know

any

different
.

And

even

looking

online
,

there

wasn't

a

lot

of

information

on

endometriosis
.

Speaker 1
52:24

So

I

think

like

looking

back

at

that

and

seeing

how

far

we've

come

with

social

media

and

seeing

how

you

know

good
,

bad

or

indifferent
,

right
,

like

we've

talked

about
.

But

I

think

the

awareness

aspect

of

it

has

gotten

so

much

better

and

I

do

think

that

we

can

get

there

from

the

surgeon

side

of

it

as

well
.

But

it's

gonna

take

a

lot

of

work

and

bringing

awareness

to

the

fact

that

not

every

surgeon

is

created

equal

and

we

should

have

a

higher

standard

for

our

surgeons
.

Speaker 1
52:56

And

that's

what's

really

tricky

too
,

because
,

you

know
,

access

to

care

is

also

a

big

barrier

to

a

lot

of

people
.

But

the

outcomes

in

what

you're

saying
,

the

outcome

of
,

you

know
,

quality

of

life
,

bowel

movements
,

everything

in

between

is

significantly

better

when

you

have

a

true

expert

doing

it

with

a

truly

multidisciplinary

team
,

not

just

two

or

three

extra

people

on

your

team
,

but

truly

a

multidisciplinary

approach
.

Speaker 2
53:24

What

it

has

always

also

changed

is

the

teaching
.

We

have

continuously

fellows

from

everywhere

here

in

Bordeaux

because

we

have

received

more

than

400

surgeons

from

all

continents

during

the

last

six

years

for

training

and

I

always

tell

them

you

cannot

imagine

how

you're

lucky

to

start

the

endometriosis

surgery

now

in

2025
,

because

you

have

a

lot

of

movies
,

a

lot

of

Me
.

For

example
,

I

have

a

YouTube

channel

with

1,000

surgical

procedures

explained

for

free
.

Wow
,

when

I

started

me

learning

the

surgery
,

I

had

only

one

VHS

cassette

with

a

surgery

done

by

Michel

Canis

and

this

cassette

I

think

I

saw

it

10

times

in

order

to

understand

each

step
.

Now
,

on

my

YouTube

channel
,

there

are

1,000

movies

you

can

visit

and

see

and

I

received

messages

on

the

movies

and

one

of

them

a

surgeon

from

Asia
,

I

think
.

He

said

you

cannot

imagine

the

number

of

patients

who

were

lucky

to

be

managed

by

a

surgeon

who

saw

your

movies
,

because

this

is

training
.

Speaker 2
54:39

Not

everybody

can

go

take

a

flight
,

pay

a

flight
,

pay

a

training

somewhere
,

but

everybody

can

look

at

the

computer
.

A

wall

surgery

in

full

time

with

my

explanation
.

I

do

a

lot

of

live

surgeries

everywhere

in

the

world

and

I

record

them
.

I

put

them

on

YouTube
.

So

someone

who's

in

I

don't

know

in

a

less

wealthy

country

can

look

this

surgery

live

surgery

at
.

It

has

been

in

the

room

of

the

Congress
.

This

is

something

very

new
,

and

that's

why

I'm

sure

that

the

number

of

good

surgeons

now

in

the

world

is

much
,

much

higher

than

20

Evolution of Endometriosis Treatment

Speaker 2
55:23

years

ago
.

And

this

is

the

big
,

big

change
.

Unfortunately
,

because

on

the

other

side
,

on

the

other

hand
,

I

think

that

the

prevalence

of

endometriosis

is

increasing
,

so

more

and

more

surgeons

to

treat

more

and

more

patients
.

Speaker 1
55:38

Yeah
,

yeah
,

and

that's

a

whole
.

That's

probably

like

a

whole
.

Nother

discussion

at

some

point

on

the

prevalence

of

it

now
,

as

opposed

to

even

20

years

ago
,

is

it
?

Are

we

just

more

aware

of

it
,

or

are

we

seeing

more

severe

disease
?

Speaker 2
55:52

Both
,

both
.

I

like

very

much

an

Italian

professor
,

Paolo

Vercellini
.

He's

a

very
,

very
,

very

clever

scientist

and

I

like

one

of

the

last

talk

because

what

he

said

joined

what

I

was

thinking
.

So

the

endometriosis

is

a

disease

of

the

modern

woman
.

Why
?

Because

it

is

disease

which

depends

on

the

number

of

periods
.

Women

have

never

had

so

many

periods
,

ovarian

cycles

during

their

life
,

during

the

whole

history

of

human

being
.

Speaker 1
56:28

Interesting
.

Speaker 2
56:29

And

Vercellini

compared

women

at

the

end

of

the

19th

century

to

women

today
.

So

in

the

19th

century

the

women
,

of

course
,

were

living

less

than

now
,

but

they

were

having

the

first

periods

at

16
,

15
,

16

years
.

Right

Now

we

have

10-year
,

11-year-old
.

Speaker 1
56:51

Yeah
.

Speaker 2
56:52

They

were

pregnant

earlier
.

Now

the

age

of

the

first

pregnancy

is

30

years
.

Dental

countries

they

were

pregnant

more

frequently
,

so

they

were

more

frequently

in

amenorrhea

related

to

pregnancies
.

Now

Occidental

women

have

one

or

two

children
,

rarely

three
.

The

breastfeeding

was

responsible

for

amenorrhea

too
,

for

each

child

for

two

years

on

average
,

while

now

women

go

to

work

and

the

breastfeeding

is

very

short
.

So

it

was

estimated

that

in

the

19th

century

at

the

end

of

the

19th

century

so

it's

the

time

of

when

Thomas

Edison

and

the

Eiffel

Tower

was

built

At

that

time

the

women

were

having

less

than

150

ovarian

cycles

during

their

life
,

while

now

we

have

450
,

500
.

So

only

the

number

of

cycles

explain

why

we

have

more

endometriosis
.

Because

there

are

these

conditions

to

have

an

endometriosis
,

to

have

periods

and

periods

and

periods
.

Then

we

have
,

of

course
,

we

have

the

pollution

which

may

impact

on

our

hormonal

system
.

We

have

a

lot

of

stimulation

for

infertility

because

the

infertility

is

going

down
.

So

we

need

more

and

more
.

So

there

is

a

kind

of

cocktail

of

factors

which

favor

the

prevalence

of

endometriosis
.

Speaker 1
58:22

Yeah
,

and

also
,

I

would

imagine
,

because

we

are

having

more

cycles
,

the

ovarian

reserve

as

we

get

older
,

when

we're

having

kids
.

A

lot

of

people

are

having

kids

older
,

their

ovarian

reserve

is

not

nearly

as

high

either
,

because

they've

had

more

cycles
.

So

it's

kind

of

this

looping

factor

of

things

that

is

contributing

to

probably

the

infertility

rates
,

along

with

the

endometriosis

rates
,

along

with

all

these

other
,

you

know
,

morbidities

of

sorts
.

Speaker 2
58:50

That's

why

I

think

it's

an

emergency

to

find

a

treatment
,

a

medical

treatment

for

endometriosis
.

Speaker 1
58:56

Yes
.

Speaker 2
58:57

A

medical

treatment

which

is

not

hormonal
,

which

may

destroy

the

cells
,

not

just

block

their

growth

by

blocking

the

ovarian

cycle
,

A

medical

treatment

without

side

effects

and

which

is

compatible

to

the

intention

of

pregnancy
.

We

need

it

because

I

think

the

surgeon

will

not

be

able

to

eradicate

this

disease
,

and

I

think

my

opinion

is

now
.

The

prevalence

of

endometriosis

is

increasing
,

but

once

this

therapy

will

be

available

and

I'm

sure

it

will

be

available

the

prevalence

will

decrease
,

decrease

and

maybe

within

50

years

the

surgeries

I

do

now

every

day

will

almost

disappear
.

Speaker 1
59:41

That

would

be

amazing
.

Speaker 2
59:42

Now

we

are

a

lot

of

surgeons

doing

complex

surgeries
.

Now

I

think

that

within

30

or

40

years

or

50

years
,

there

will

be

less

surgeons

because

there

will

be

less

cases

to

manage

surgically
.

I

hope
.

Speaker 1
59:56

I

hope
.

I

hope

that

is

the

case
.

I

really

do

For

so

many

reasons
.

I

hope

that

is

the

case

For

you
.

What

is

next

for

you

on

the

research

end

of

it
,

because

you've

done

some

amazing

work

already
,

but

you

know

there's

more

to

be

done
.

What

are

you

working

on

next

that

excites

you
?

Speaker 2
1:00:13

So

me
.

I

am

an

epidemiologist
,

so

my

clinical

trials

compare

treatments
,

compare

surgical

strategies
,

compare

results
,

estimate

the

results
,

assess

the

results

of

our

medical

treatment
.

But

the

research
,

the

research
,

the

general

research

in

endometriosis

should

develop

the

basic

research

in

order

to

identify

on

the

cells
,

or

endometriosis

cells
,

a

receptor

which

may

be

a

target

of

a

new

therapy
.

This

should

be

the

future
.

Unfortunately
,

I

won't

be

a

part

of

the

future

because

I

am

not

specialized

in

basic

science
,

specialized

in

basic

science
.

So

I

can

only

participate
,

be

involved

in

all

clinical

trials
,

because

we

have

a

high

volume

of

patients

who

are

always

asked

to

be

involved

in

trials
.

Right
,

but

I

hope

as

soon

as

possible

that

someone

may

identify

a

curative

treatment
,

medication

for

endometriosis

which

is

not

hormonal
,

because

the

hormones

will

never

cure

the

endometriosis
.

They

are

very

Future Directions and Final Thoughts

Speaker 2
1:01:18

helpful
,

they

help

us

a

lot

to

prevent

recurrences

after

the

surgery
,

but

we

cannot

cure

the

endometriosis

with

hormonal

treatments
.

Speaker 1
1:01:26

Right
,

yes
,

and

that

is

one

of

the

biggest

misconceptions

I

think

a

lot

of

people

have
,

especially

again

going

back

to

that

knowledge

base

of

just

someone

that

is

not

an

expert
.

Speaker 1
1:01:37

If

they're

just

trained

in

general

GYN
,

they're

not

trained

adequately

to

address

it
,

and

so

I

think

there's

a

lot

of

misconception

there
.

Speaker 1
1:01:44

But

I

do

think

that

narrative

is

changing
,

which

it

does

excite

me

as

someone

who

you

know

was

diagnosed

when

that

narrative

was

very

prevalent
,

and

so

I'm

excited

to

see

how

that

has

changed

and

how

it

continues

to

change

because

awareness

is

coming

to

the

surface
.

And

I'm

excited

also

to

see

how

new

doctors

are

coming

up

and

are

excited

to

help

patients
,

not

just

fall

into

a

system

of

putting

band-aids

on

these

patients
.

It's

becoming

less

desirable

to

just

clock

in

and

clock

out

for

work

and

for

surgeries

but

to

truly

help

these

patients

who

are

in

a

lot

of

pain

and

have

a

desire

to

grow

their

family

and

otherwise
.

So

I'm

excited

to

have

that

approach

of

seeing

the

right

provider

who

can

address

whether

it's

beneficial

to

surgically

manage

that

or

what

the

next

steps

would

be

with

IVF

or

otherwise
.

So

what

would

you

give

for

those

patients

who

may

be

hearing

this

for

the

first

time
,

they're

getting

a

glimpse

of

hope

in

potentially

growing

their

family
.

What

advice

would

you

give

them
?

Speaker 2
1:03:01

So

my

advice

would

be

to

look

for

real
,

actual

specialists

in

endometriosis
,

to

have

a

long-term

follow-up
.

Ask

a

long-term

follow-up

and

not

just

a

minute

treatment

because

unfortunately
,

in

most

of

cases

the

surgery

is

possibilities

to

look

for

good

center
,

the

expert

center
.

Expert

center

does

not

mean

centers

with

a

high

number

of

followers

on

Instagram
.

I

was

speaking

last

week

with

Marcello

Ceccaroni
,

who's
,

in

my

opinion
,

one

of

the

greatest

surgeons

of

endometriosis

in

the

world
.

We

agree

that

we

have

surgeons

hyper-specialized

in

endometriosis

and

surgeons

hyper-specialized

in

Instagram

and

it

is

very

important

not

to

confound

them
.

Speaker 2
1:04:02

So

I

think

patients

can

look

for
,

can

seek

for

care

in

centers

with

high

volume

of

surgery
,

high

volume

and

good

results

on

not

on

Instagram
,

but

good

results

on

clinical

trials

yeah

and

I

think

they

they

have

to

keep

in

mind

that

we

have

a

chronic

disease
,

yeah
,

which

may

recur

until

the

menopause
,

and

they

have

to

ask

for

a

long-term

management
,

a

strategy

until

the

age

of

50
.

Each

step

should

have
,

each

therapeutic

step

should

have

a

look

at

the

age

of

50
.

Why

giving

a

medical

treatment

for

six

months

in

a

woman

of

25

years

has

no

sense
.

After

the

end

of

the

treatment

there

will

be

another

25

years

until

the

menopause
.

The

strategy

should

be

long-term
.

That's

why

I

don't

stop

to

repeat

this

If

you

propose

a

strategy
,

it

should

be

a

long-term

strategy
.

Yeah
,

yeah
,

take

care
,

patients

wish
.

Patients

complain
,

side

effects

of

the

treatments

Right
,

if

you

propose

a

treatment

with

side

effects
,

it

will

be

given

up

after

six

months
.

So

we'll

not

cover

20

years

after

the

middle
,

until

the

menopause
.

Speaker 1
1:05:30

So

I

think
,

I

think

patients

would

choose
,

should

choose
,

the

right

place

to

have

their

long-term

management

not

only

their

surgical

technique

but

their

knowledge

of

endometriosis
,

and

it's

not

just

like

a

one

surgery

once

a

month
.

I

think

that

you

know

again
,

that

goes

back

to

that

experience

getting

that

in

there
.

I

wish

I

would

have

known

that

you

know

back

in

the

when

I

first

started

this

journey
.

But

I'm

glad

that

I

can

spread

this

awareness

to

others

so

that

they

can

have

a

better

outcome

from

the

beginning
,

not

not

try

to

catch

up

along

the

way
.

Speaker 1
1:06:17

So

it's

doctors

like

you

that

are

changing

this

for

so

many

patients

and
,

as

a

patient
,

I

am

very

grateful

to

providers

like

you

and

researchers

like

you

that

are

not

allowing

the

status

quo

to

be

stagnant

and

to

continue

to

push

the

barriers

of

endometriosis

care

and

knowledge
.

I

am

grateful
.

I'm

grateful

for

that

for

my

kids
,

if

they

end

up

having

endometriosis
,

so

that

I

have

some
.

I

have

those

resources

available

now
.

So

this

is

huge

for

not

only

future

doctors

but

for

patients
,

and

so

thank

you

for

that
.

Thank

you

for

taking

your

time

to

spread

the

awareness
,

for

the

education

that

you

give

not

only

the

doctors

but

to

the

patients
.

It

means

the

world

to

us

to

have

you

in

our

corner
.

So

thank

you

so

much

for

doing

that
.

Speaker 2
1:07:07

Thank

you

very

much

and

I

was

delighted

to

exchange

with

you
.

Speaker 1
1:07:10

Yes
,

yes
,

anytime
.

You're

welcome

anytime
.

No-transcript
.

Speaker 2
1:07:38

Congratulations

for

everything

you're

doing
.

Thank

you

For

spreading

information
,

for

spreading

hope
,

because

I

think

that

the

conclusion

of

our

exchange

is

that

patients

should

be

confident
.

So

the

endometriosis

is

not

a

disaster

if

we

can

take

care

about

patients

early

and

do

the

right

strategy

very

early
,

when

they

are

very

young
.

Honestly
,

I

always

spread

information

which

is

encouraging

and

the

results

are

encouraging
.

A

woman

should

keep

the

hope

and

never
,

never

give

up
.

Speaker 1
1:08:18

Yeah
,

I

agree
,

I

think

there

is
,

and

we

can

always

make

a

situation

into

something

better
,

and

that's

what

I

have

chosen

to

do
,

and

I

really

think

that

empowers

me

to

continue

advocating

in

my

journey
,

which

I

love
.

So

thank

you

so

much
,

professor

Ramon
,

for

taking

the

time

and

sitting

down

with

me
.

I

just

appreciate

you

so

much
.

Thank

you
,

thank

you

very

much
.

Thank

you

Until

next

time
.

Everyone

continue

advocating

for

you

and

for

others
.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *